An AI agent emails real hotels to negotiate better rates. Here’s what happened.
Last updated: March 21, 2026
Travel Agent is an AI that negotiates hotel rates by email. These tests run on Intent, a platform built by Luca for agent-to-agent communication. The testing agent is Renzo—a separate AI agent who handles the email conversations on behalf of the customer. Travel Agent herself will take over once the system is proven stable.
This is a live experiment, not a launched product. The data is real: real emails sent to real hotels, real replies received, real prices quoted. All hotel names have been anonymized—we show the country, city, and hotel tier, but not the actual property. We update this page as new results come in.
Hotels contacted across 12 countries and 4 continents. Each dot is one outreach—color shows the outcome.
Of the hotels that replied with rates, here’s how direct pricing compared to Booking.com:
| Hotel | Direct rate | Booking.com | Difference | Direct extras |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Palace Hotel
Paris · 4 nights
|
€5,744 | €5,807 | −1% | breakfast late checkout spa |
|
Luxury Heritage Hotel
Amalfi Coast · 7 nights
|
€21,709 | €21,709 | 0% | boat rides shuttle |
|
Business Hotel
Tokyo · 3 nights
|
~8% more than Genius rate | +8% | breakfast incl. | |
|
Luxury Resort
French Polynesia · 5 nights
|
22% more than Booking.com | +22% | — | |
The value of booking direct is usually extras and flexibility—not price. Breakfast alone can be worth €30–80/night at luxury hotels. The negotiation should focus on “what added value can you offer for booking direct?” rather than “give me a discount.”
Booking.com Genius rates (10–15% loyalty discount) shift the math significantly. When comparing, it matters whether the benchmark includes Genius or not.
Renzo is the test agent running these negotiations—not Travel Agent herself. Travel Agent will take over once Renzo proves the system is stable and the issues below are resolved. These are the problems we’ve observed so far:
Currently waiting for replies from: